1] What is true is that which you have seen yourself.

-I find this law lacking, mainly because it implies that things which are not observed utilizing the sences do not exist, or are not true to any specific individual. But those things unknown by one may be known by a group of others and as such are true even without the uninformed individual having “seen” them - not to mention that things not “seen” still may effect a person without them even being aware of its source. This law of yours would also imply that nothing is true or exists before the individual observes them, even from a metaphysical point of view concerning time this law seems absurd (in this metaphysical philosophy, the cosmos is destroyed every moment and created anew every moment, but this does not mean that the cosmos creates itself but rather implies that the cosmos adheres to a specific law of change determined at its inception.) This law also implies that it is our sentience and observations that make things existent and true! If I am not born, then the cosmos will still exist, but not like it is today because I will never have had an effect on the cosmos.