Comments on: <RK> as Internal Live PR; Evidence and Findings http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/ SEO Expert and Philosophical Sci-Fi Author Sat, 17 May 2008 22:05:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Current Pagerank Tools - SEOlogs.com http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-33710 Current Pagerank Tools - SEOlogs.com Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:59:28 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-33710 [...] Jim Westergren gives this explanation: Matt, hope you are ok that I post this , anyways I give here my theory: [...] […] Jim Westergren gives this explanation: Matt, hope you are ok that I post this , anyways I give here my theory: […]

]]> By: منتديات http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-32786 منتديات Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:53:10 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-32786 I think google now play around something like webrank not pagerank I think google now play around something like webrank
not pagerank

]]> By: redirect http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-31228 redirect Mon, 14 May 2007 01:40:20 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-31228 Cbin your case looks just like the one I had last year. I bought expired domain of which some .cgi subpages showed lots of PR7s,6s,5s and one index.cgi PR8. Confirmed by all known PR detection tools. Includo=ing one of the best - http://www.database-search.com/sys/pre-check-en.php The cache was correct to. It must of been same type of google mixup though, because by itself subpages ranked top5 for some high keywords among only gov and edu sites for a long while but links from it did not show real power as one would expect from PR8 site and then it all was corrected and out of the index it went.That was the best $106 I spend at snapnames so far :) Cbin your case looks just like the one I had last year. I bought expired domain of which some .cgi subpages showed lots of PR7s,6s,5s and one index.cgi PR8. Confirmed by all known PR detection tools. Includo=ing one of the best - http://www.database-search.com/sys/pre-check-en.php
The cache was correct to. It must of been same type of google mixup though, because by itself subpages ranked top5 for some high keywords among only gov and edu sites for a long while but links from it did not show real power as one would expect from PR8 site and then it all was corrected and out of the index it went.That was the best $106 I spend at snapnames so far :)

]]> By: Second Annual Report, My Success Online http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-29532 Second Annual Report, My Success Online Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:25:47 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-29532 [...] I did my research on the Google RK parameter and published it as an article. [...] […] I did my research on the Google RK parameter and published it as an article. […]

]]> By: Ross http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-15013 Ross Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:47:17 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-15013 There is some great information here, but unfortunately I didn't find what I was looking for. Does anyone know where I can find a working php script that gets the PR but is designed to work on a 64 bit system? I have found a few and got only one to half work. It is a bit odd because it will get the PR for most websites but for the rest it will give an error. Can anyone help me please? There is some great information here, but unfortunately I didn’t find what I was looking for. Does anyone know where I can find a working php script that gets the PR but is designed to work on a 64 bit system? I have found a few and got only one to half work. It is a bit odd because it will get the PR for most websites but for the rest it will give an error. Can anyone help me please?

]]> By: Bagfull http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-9044 Bagfull Sat, 05 Aug 2006 17:12:21 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-9044 Great article. Helped to understand the PR thing. Keep it up. Great article. Helped to understand the PR thing. Keep it up.

]]> By: SEOhosting http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-6947 SEOhosting Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:14:05 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-6947 Another great article by Jim Westergren, I really Liked the LivePR tool: http://livepr.raketforskning.com/ :It's a great tool to bookmark, for use every couple weeks. I been using A PR prediction tool. But have been wondering why when I tpye My URL like this http://www.decent11hosing.com I get a prediction, but when I type it like this http://decent11hosing.com I get a different prediction. It's the same with the backlink checker I use, I type it both ways and get two different results. It really comes down to which one I should be advertising if not both, and are they considered 2 different links by google even though it's the same site or are both links consider two seperate websites by google. Thanks any help would be Appreciated. Another great article by Jim Westergren, I really Liked the LivePR tool: http://livepr.raketforskning.com/ :It’s a great tool to bookmark, for use every couple weeks.

I been using A PR prediction tool. But have been wondering why when I tpye My URL like this http://www.decent11hosing.com I get a prediction, but when I type it like this http://decent11hosing.com I get a different prediction.
It’s the same with the backlink checker I use, I type it both ways and get two different results.
It really comes down to which one I should be advertising if not both, and are they considered 2 different links by google even though it’s the same site or are both links consider two seperate websites by google.
Thanks any help would be Appreciated.

]]> By: Jade "jamire" B. Cimafranca http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-2256 Jade "jamire" B. Cimafranca Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:48:20 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-2256 this is interesting and complicated. i got confused.. hehe :) this is interesting and complicated.
i got confused.. hehe :)

]]> By: Jason http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-1640 Jason Sat, 03 Jun 2006 01:03:22 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-1640 Nicely done, Jim. Keep these articles coming! Nicely done, Jim. Keep these articles coming!

]]> By: goggle http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-656 goggle Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:57:13 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-656 Great info all round Jim... The comments are so cool that they can make up for another article ;) Great info all round Jim… The comments are so cool that they can make up for another article ;)

]]> By: Matt Cutts answers questions http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-467 Matt Cutts answers questions Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:23:35 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-467 [...] There he answers a lot of questions including the RK parameter and gives a lot of valuable info for an SEO: [...] […] There he answers a lot of questions including the RK parameter and gives a lot of valuable info for an SEO: […]

]]> By: Trevor http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-456 Trevor Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:26:26 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-456 I have checked it out and it is gone now! Everyone shows a live PR0. It was too good to last. I have checked it out and it is gone now! Everyone shows a live PR0. It was too good to last.

]]> By: a1whs.com http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-451 a1whs.com Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:52:43 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-451 Well i am pretty said that now LPR is zero cause it was at 5 but still i only got a pr of 3 . So i am hoping maybe after 3 months i would have rank of 5 or higher. Well i am pretty said that now LPR is zero cause it was at 5 but still i only got a pr of 3 . So i am hoping maybe after 3 months i would have rank of 5 or higher.

]]> By: Jim Westergren http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-444 Jim Westergren Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:29:31 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-444 Yes, true. Yes, true.

]]> By: Mong http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-rk-as-internal-live-pagerank-pr-evidence-findings/#comment-441 Mong Sat, 25 Mar 2006 07:24:50 +0000 http://www.jimwestergren.com/google-as-pr-evidence-and-findings-from-the-serp-xml-feed/#comment-441 Now RK is continuously ZERO. So imo it was real current Page Rank and now google has disappeared it for permanently. Now RK is continuously ZERO.
So imo it was real current Page Rank and now google has disappeared it for permanently.

]]>